Killing Roe v. Wade could have ripple effects on democracy

A leaked draft decision of the U.S. Supreme Court suggests the iconic Roe V Wade legislation could be overturned. That would directly impact women’s right to abortion. Democracy could become another casualty. .

 

Last night, just as I was getting ready for sleep, I found out about the leak of a draft decision from the U.S. Supreme Court in Politico striking down Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision making abortion a constitutional right.

As you no doubt know by now, the decision strikes down one of the best-known U.S. legal decisions, saying it was “egregiously wrong from the start” and that abortion is such a controversial issue it should be solved by politicians at the state level.

It is impossible to exaggerate the importance of this decision—not only to all those with unwanted pregnancies, especially those who are poor, Black and immigrant, but also potentially to many of the rights we have fought for and won over the last decades.

Roe v. Wade made abortion a legal and constitutional right in 1973, when abortion was still criminalized in Canada. The decision has been at the centre of the so-called culture wars ever since.
Tweet this Tweet this

In the U.S., defending that right has been the primary issue of the feminist movement for many decades. The powerful anti-choice forces have tried everything from violence against doctors and clinic workers to stacking the Supreme Court with anti-choice judges to end the right to abortion. And now it looks like they have won.

While we long expected this decision after Trump stacked the court with anti-choice justices, it is even worse than we thought. Thirteen states have already passed seriously restrictive abortion laws, including total bans, that come into effect as soon as the Roe v. Wade decision is made.

The arguments against abortion as a constitutional right could be used against any right that was not originally in the constitution—threatening same-sex marriage, civil rights and even potentially cross racial marriage.

While I am not one to rely on the justice system to defend our rights, it is central to democracy that there is an impartial body to judge disputes, especially when it comes to human rights. Now that system is threatened in the U.S. in a way that it has never been before.

My hope is that an intersectional movement that is greater than any we have ever seen will rise up in the U.S. against this decision, pressuring the Democrats to do whatever it takes to get codifying abortion rights in the law through legislation.

That means ending the filibuster. I’m not going to hold my breath on that one, but progressives are a majority in the United States. It’s hard to get excited about the do-nothing Biden administration. Now there’s a reason to get out the vote.

How will this affect Canada?

It is very unlikely that anyone of any influence will try and recriminalize abortion in Canada. Canada is much more pro-choice than the U.S. The latest polls show 70% of Canadians find abortion laws acceptable and only 10% find the unacceptable.

There is no constitutional right to abortion in Canada, but there is a constitutional right to security of the person and the Supreme Court decided that criminalizing abortion was a violation of that right.

We’ve been successfully fighting in most provinces to make abortion a medical service like any other.

Moreover, only the federal government can decided on criminal law in Canada. Unlike in the U.S., where states also can pass criminal laws, that is an exclusive federal jurisdiction in Canada. It’s worth noting that even former Prime Minister Stephen Harper, who is a dyed-in-the-wool social conservative, didn’t dare to try re-criminalizing abortion.

Nevertheless, the anti-choice movement in Canada, which is still strong, will definitely feel the wind in their sails. They just succeeded in financing four of the 10 candidates for the Conservative Party of Canada leadership. Even though three of their four candidates did not qualify, this show of strength is meant to pressure the successful candidate to do whatever he can to limit access to abortion.

And it’s access where the problem is. In Alberta, access to abortion is slowly being eroded. It’s been a recent fight in New Brunswick and P.E.I. While the Ontario PC party is trying hard to dissociate from social conservatives before the June 2 election, there is little question that, if they are re-elected, the anti-choice will up the pressure to restrict access.

The pro-choice movement can take this opportunity to show the power of that pro-choice majority by taking the streets and social media to defend Roe v. Wade.
Tweet this Tweet this

Pro-choice groups are also promoting increased access to reproductive justice, including: universal, free contraception; teaching providers and the public about abortion to normalize it; and ensuring free abortion care in all provinces, including any travel costs.

Education about the history of the pro-choice struggle in Canada is also important. It was one of our most successful social movements and it deserves to be celebrated.

The first action to defend Roe V Wade was held the day after the leak at the U.S. consulate in Toronto, which was organized by the Ontario Coalition for Abortion Clinics, the group that led the fight to legalize freestanding clinics in the 1980s.

Make no mistake. If the U.S. Supreme Court holds the position outlined in the leaked document, the political civil war deepened by Trump will get more ferocious than we have ever seen it.

The stakes couldn’t be higher. Republican majorities in either the House or the Senate in this year’s election will continue the paralysis that slows or stops the Democrats from making progressive change. And if the Republicans win the next presidency, I fear we will no longer be able to call the U.S. a democratic country—and the impact of that is incalculable.

 

Posted on May 5 in THE MONITOR

JUDY REBICK
Judy Rebick was the founding publisher of rabble.ca and a leader in the pro-choice movement during the 1980s.